Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 5:02:24 GMT
Popular food website Epicurious.com announced Monday: No more beef recipes. This stemmed from his concern about climate change. According to The Huffington Post , editors said the website wants to encourage more sustainable ways of eating instead of meat dishes. In addition to not publishing new recipes with beef , going forward there will be no articles or social media posts about beef . The website will continue to publish new recipes for chicken, pork and seafood and justifies this by saying that these meats do not have the same level of environmental impact as beef. No more recipes with beef, to promote the fight against climate change The change was actually made without fanfare a year ago, and editors said data suggests readers respond positively to vegetarian and meat-alternative recipes. But do not worry… All previously published beef content remains available and there are no plans to withdraw it. You can also see beef in our recipe galleries, most of which are pieces of archival content that are updated slightly each year. The website explained in an FAQ post about the change.
In the post announcing the change, the editors admitted that some people might assume that the new editorial direction "indicates some kind of revenge against cows, or the people who eat them," but insisted that "this Ecuador Mobile Number List decision does not "It was taken because we hate hamburgers (we don't hate them!)." Instead, the editors said the change — which they believe is “not anti-beef, but rather pro-planet” — is about “not giving airtime to one of the worst climate offenders.” of the world". Epicurious' edict does not extend to other forms of meat such as pork, chicken and seafood. The editors say this is because studies suggest that "beef alone is responsible for around 35% of the greenhouse gases in our diet." No more beef recipes! Considering Fox News sparked a huge controversy last weekend by falsely claiming that President Joe Biden's climate change plan would ban hamburgers, it's no surprise that many people were upset with Epicurious. For example, Mediaite noted that if Epicurious were really serious about limiting beef consumption, editors would simply remove all beef recipes from the website.
One Twitter user noted that Epicurious helped sustainability in at least one way: It gave Fox News shows a narrative that should sustain them for many episodes. Epicurious makes a strong play for days worth of Fox News segments. Fox News contributor anticipated the complaint. However, some Twitter users tried to point out that any issues people may have with the dishes may simply be conservative virtue signaling, since the change was made in 2020 and no one complained until Monday's announcement, such as: what do you think of this alternative of no more recipes with beef Auden Schendler So…could corporate sustainability be corporate complicity? Possibly yes. A well-intentioned distraction The problem is not only that sustainable business practices do not scale, but that they displace meaningful action. A company that pursues “sustainability” becomes, in the eyes of the media and in the perception of the customer, a “green” company absolved from doing anything else. This despite the fact that its intentions are in process, that is, the company does not even need to reduce its emissions to be labeled as a leader, it just aspires to do so.